Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| doc:srdl2_tutorial [2014/11/27 16:52] – [Requirements of an action] admin | doc:srdl2_tutorial [2014/11/27 17:05] (current) – [Matching requirements to capabilities] admin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| $ rosrun rosprolog rosprolog knowrob_srdl | $ rosrun rosprolog rosprolog knowrob_srdl | ||
| - | % Load SRDL model of the PR2 robot | + | % Load SRDL model of the PR2 and Baxter robots |
| ?- owl_parse(' | ?- owl_parse(' | ||
| + | ?- owl_parse(' | ||
| % Load an example task description for serving a drink | % Load an example task description for serving a drink | ||
| Line 120: | Line 121: | ||
| ===== Missing components or capabilities ===== | ===== Missing components or capabilities ===== | ||
| - | | + | <code prolog> |
| - | Cap = ' | + | % No components nor capabilities are missing for the ServeADrink action on the PR2: |
| - | Cap = ' | + | ?- missing_comp_for_action(serve_drink:'ServeADrink', |
| + | false. | ||
| - | | + | ?- missing_cap_for_action(serve_drink:'ServeADrink', |
| - | false. | + | false. |
| - | + | % The Baxter robot, in contrast, cannot perform the task due to lacking navigation abilities: | |
| - | ===== Matching requirements to capabilities | + | ?- missing_cap_for_action(serve_drink:' |
| + | C = srdl2cap:' | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ===== Behind the scenes: Implementation of the matching procedures | ||
| The matching can effectively reduced to the following statement: | The matching can effectively reduced to the following statement: | ||
| + | <code prolog> | ||
| missing_cap_for_action(Action, | missing_cap_for_action(Action, | ||
| | | ||
| \+ cap_available_on_robot(Cap, | \+ cap_available_on_robot(Cap, | ||
| - | A missing capability is thus defined as one that is required by an action, but not provided by the robot. Required means that either the action itself or any sub-action has a dependency on this capability: | + | </ |
| + | |||
| + | A missing capability is thus defined as one that is required by an action but not provided by the robot. | ||
| + | <code prolog> | ||
| required_cap_for_action(Action, | required_cap_for_action(Action, | ||
| | | ||
| Line 140: | Line 149: | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | There are three possibilities to express that a capability is available on a robot: Either it is asserted to be available for the whole class of robots (e.g. every PR2 has a holonomic base), for a specific robot instance, or it can be concluded that the capability should be available because all specified dependencies on components or other capabilities are fulfilled: | ||
| + | There are three possibilities to express that a capability is available on a robot: Either it is asserted to be available for the whole class of robots (e.g. every PR2 has a mobile base), for a specific robot instance, or it can be concluded that the capability should be available because all specified dependencies on components or other capabilities are fulfilled: | ||
| + | <code prolog> | ||
| % capability asserted for robot instance | % capability asserted for robot instance | ||
| cap_available_on_robot(Cap, | cap_available_on_robot(Cap, | ||
| Line 162: | Line 173: | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| + | </ | ||
| The matching procedure is equivalent for components. | The matching procedure is equivalent for components. | ||

